re: #201 bfos

In scenario #2 and #3, I’m almost sure that an ultrasound would have already been performed. I admittedly, don’t know all of the details of this specific regulation in regards to what the practitioner must tell the patient. Certainly, there could be things that I would believe to be over the line. I’m also working with the assumption these ultrasounds won’t be carried out by the local Baptist pastor bent on changing the woman’s mind.

The ban of malpractice insurance seems insane.

OK, I was composing an answer to your #198, but now I see it is not worth my time. Here’s a link to the full text of the law, as provided by Lawhawk above. Read it, then give an opinion.

Sheesh.