What puzzles me about guys like Terry Moran and Jake Tapper - they’ve been around a while. They aren’t newbies. You mean to tell me “according to secret documents prepared on the basis of a purported eyewitness account” didn’t set off ANY warning signals for them? And then the docs themselves say that the so-called eyewitness was NEVER EVEN VETTED FULLY? Before making such serious charges?

Is this the future of journalism?

I know some writers I follow questioned the sourcing, so it’s not universal yet, whatever’s going on. Maybe there’s still time to stop it, if we act fast.