re: #194 astronmr20

What crap? The Polar 5 expedition was crap? Why?

re: #198 Dark_Falcon

Ludwig, how is his article crap? Please elaborate, as that would help me understand.

Well the issue is one of cherry picking. First off, certain regions of the poles are predicted to get thicker by the models as weather patterns change. This is a local phenomena and on average, nope they are going. This is not the mark of there is no problem, this is the mark of shifting currents in water and wind.

The denier sphere lives to point to that and make noise as if this is some evidence against the science, when in reality is supports it - and verifies certain models… Ohhh they hate that part…

Once again, Sinclair has a video.

youtube.com