re: #226 Lidane

I’m reading it and I’m not understanding his point. So far, he’s stating the obvious— that young people raised in troubled, violent homes by neglectful parents and who never have any sort of real connection to the world around them will eventually turn to crime. They’re also malnourished because they never had any connection with food apart from just eating whatever was around.

The rest of this article is him patting himself on the back for figuring that out, but he doesn’t offer a solution or anything of value beyond that. What the hell am I supposed to get out of this article again?

You missed the first part? When they fed vitamins to one group of criminals, and placebos to another, the vitamin group behaved better.

Nutrition could have a real effect on human lives. The malnutrition is not aside from the impoverished life, it was part of it.