re: #22 goddamnedfrank

The import of the McGahn ruling isn’t McGahn, it’s that Bolton might simply take the lower court’s opinion as providing enough cover to comply with his own subpoena. Not that I’d count on it, he seems pretty conflicted between being perceived as loyal and wanting to tell his side of the story and not get smeared as part of the conspiracy to cover up these crimes. His mental calculous right now is probably preoccupied with figuring out which course of action will maximize his future book sales.

I would think that testifying in Congress and blowing the lid off all the bullshit he saw and had to deal with would be a great way to maximize any future potential book sales revenue.