re: #235 Aceofwhat?

Easy. If we are concerned that a judge will alter their ruling based on having received $X from Y in terms of direct or indirect campaign spending, then judges shouldn’t be allowed to rule on cases involving Y.

The alternative, a sweeping restriction in advertising on behalf of candidates, is like filling a pothole with a bulldozer.

CU has nothing to do with direct campaign donations. I repeat, CU has nothing to do with direct campaign donations.