re: #234 Jimmah

You smeared him by suggesting that there was something amiss with him - “he’s no Barret Brown” and then said he was ‘hanging out’ with racists, like it was a purely social thing and not a part of his journalism.

I already took issue with your use of the suggestive term “hangs out with” and asked if you could justify it. You could not, yet you now repeat it. Pathetic.

“He’s not Barrett Brown” is a smear? I’m sure Mr. Brown will be amused.

The “hangs out with” part is documented. There are the photos on RS McCain’s site, and the Tweet. Hanging out on the internet counts. The Tweet was social. The party was social.

re: #235 iceweasel

Well, she could have, for example, checked the posts Weigel has written about Sailor, where she would have found out that Weigel derides him as a white nationalist and a eugenicist on a regular basis. DW links Sailor in order to mock him and inflict butthurt on him.
That gets in the way of the wardance though.
Sigh. Conservatives just don’t understand snark.

Perhaps you could link for me where Weigel writes about Sailer. I opened this by sharing info that you expressed interest in. Why would you withhold a link?

Are you referring to me as a conservative? Based on what?

By the way, I’m leaving in about ten minutes, as I always do at this time of day.