re: #237 cliffster

I think you missed the point of what I was saying. And, I certainly think it’s inappropriate that with you suggest that I callously ignore mis justice against gays because, “hey, I’m not gay”. That’s insulting on a personal level.

Oh, I don’t think you totally ignore it, I think you might… diminish its potency, shall we say. I have seen blogs light up like the fourth of July when anyone so much as sneezes something that sounds like their 2nd amendment rights are being leaned on. So we got this apocalyptic snake-handler type full on advocating criminializing my entire existence, it’s probably going to concern me more that it concerns you. World Net Daily ain’t the WSJ, but people read it, and they are often stupid and believe what they read there. There are states in the union I would be scared to death of admitting my relationship with my partner in. There’s a reason I parked my butt here in Portland Oregon, and plan to stay here for the rest of my life.

Thankfully, I think this is a sign of the religious right eating themselves, and not a sign of their rise. Doesn’t mean it doesn’t worry me. I don’t think you’re callously etc etc and it was less insult and more snark on my part. We are worried, and we are often shat on, and we are allowed some snark. ;-)