re: #230 Naso Tang

I love how you simultaneously occuse people of not getting nuance and pursuing tangents. It’s spiffy.

Yes, that is actually what I said, but I am saying that this one shows a form of stupidity that was so obviously self destructive that it could not be attributed, as might be the case, to a momentary unplanned lack of self control.

The vast majority of affairs are not momentary unplanned lack of self control, though, but continuing things.

And I have no idea why you’re positing that someone doing something highly risky is somehow indicative of being less self-destructive, based on the idea that he lacked self control in the moment.

Contrary to the prudes who need physical intercourse for something to be sexually bad, I consider these planned and deliberate acts to show an even worse mindset for someone in his position.

Yes, I really do get that you think this. I’m asking you why it shows a worse mindset than someone who has moments where he loses self control enough to sleep with someone

It’s not like having a fling on a junket is really a momentary lack of self control. You don’t just trip and wind up with your face in the bartender.

Why do you feel the need to throw in the personal insult of ‘prude’ while you’re talking about this? Just makes you feel good, or do you honestly thing your argument is stronger when you’re jabbing at other people like that?