re: #248 robdouth

If he’s making a snide comments about AGW supporting scientists, it’s not cool, but as a general non-sequitir statement it’s reasonable. The problem is, it seems a little too fishy to be the latter. If the statements about manipulating science were to show up on a creationism thread, while not directly attributed to creationism, his recs would blow up.

He’s baiting another poster here who he has previously accused of not being a real scientist, among other even worse accusations and slurs.
And yes, the shit that gets flung in AGW threads would immediately be beaten down on a creationist thread. There’s quite a bit of overlap in the two camps— it’s just that the anti-science folks here now have learned not to do that about creationism.

This particular person however is not, I believe, any sort of creationist. The ‘uncool’ is about his continuing slander of another poster.