Well, that takes the cake. It is clearly YOU who are saying to a person who was raped as a child that they might have consented and therefore their rape was non-violent.

I am saying to that person JUST THE OPPOSITE, that the adult who raped them did so violently when they forced them to have intercourse.

You have this so reversed. IT IS YOU who is defending some rape as non violent.

Buck, do you understand that statutory rape includes consensual sex between the not-of-age person and the older person?

You said it, you wrote it. Now you can say that you didn’t mean it, or you can say you mistyped, but there you are for all to see saying that ” statutory rape includes consensual sex “.

I am saying it doesn’t.