re: #257 Ming

He worked for the ACLU, and was asked to work on the Abu-Jamal case. He did so—not to any gigantic extent, but in a particular appeal based on the jury bias, which was found to have merit.

I do not understand why people focus on this so wildly, and let that one particular case define the man. Can you explain? Do you know any of his other work—like defending the VRA twice?