re: #21 ludwigvanquixote

Yes. That is what it means to be published - at least scientifically.

However, his papers that are actually scientifically published say things like : This effect may exist and it may contribute to this limited phenomena. So far so good. He is proposing a limited hypothesis to the community and people have looked into it.

That is how science works.

That is far different from he published endless proof he was correct, that it somehow debunks all of AGW, and is now somehow being denied. That is what his corporate sponsors want you to think.

So, the paper mentioned in re: #7 Captain America 1776 has probably been peer reviewed?