re: #279 Naso Tang

Depends. That is what we have courts for, to determine what is acceptable and what is not. Would you advocate throwing out evidence of any sort, say a murder, if it could be argued a warrant and prior suspicion was needed?

Oh god. You’re not even bothering to read the thread. I would indeed advocate throwing out all evidence illegally obtained, no matter what. It’s fruit of the poison tree.

Could fear of police be genetic?

Are the only choices ‘lifestyle’ or ‘genetic’? Jesus, dude, you’re in pretty dangerous territory.

#272

Indeed, I was wrong. There was one person, one, who said that. I was absolutely wrong to say no one had said it. One person did. I missed that comment— since it was only one person, at the very end of the thread.

Now, since you said ‘those’, can you find me someone else in the thread? Or can you admit that you were wrong, too?

Don’t make childish accusations, my friend.

Don’t call me your friend, please. One person in the thread advocated firing on the police even if you knew it was them. I don’t think that’s wise, or a good tactic. Yet somehow you’re lumping everyone who’s talking about this subject in with that one other person.

Acting as though the overturning of hundreds of years of precedent being greeted with shock is somehow crazy— now that’s childish.