re: #200 sattv4u2

science should be apolitical, IMHO. Isn’t that how we got into this Global Warming mess in the 1st place? Scientists accepting political tainted “grant monies” to produce studies that support the grantors pre-concieved notion?

I agree. IIRC the EPA studies on second hand smoke were similarly agenda driven. Draw your conclusion and then manipulate the data to back up the conclusion.
That’s not science. It’s politics and shame on any scientist who does act politically.