re: #256 realwest

“That’s a straw man argument since many of the anti global warming studies are funded by agenda driven sources.” That’s EXACTLY what sattv4u2 was saying.
And if you don’t think that NASA, the EPA, NOAA are agenda driven as well, then I think you’ve drunk too much Kool aid.
Without that issue, how do they truly justify their funding to continue their work in this field?

If the party takes that stand, you’ll need to explain how you can reject the main stream science without being anti science. Just like the ID’ers, you can’t just reject the science you don’t like without looking silly.