re: #276 Talking Point Detective

Your partisanship is showing.

So you think that any legal scholar who argues against the ruling of Bush V. Gore is “stupid?”

Really?

And I love the quotation marks around respected. Because you think that there aren’t widely respected legal scholars who disagreed with the court’s decision in Bush V. Gore?

Tell me, why are you so convinced about the Michael Moore-like quality of people who interpret a techincal legal ruling in a particular way? None of them have integrity in their beliefs? They can’t make a logical argument?

Sorry but I’m not interested in debating Michael Moore conspiracies about stolen elections if Florida any more than debating if 9-11 was an inside job. It’s nonsense and those who still believe it are idiots. This debate was settled long ago.