re: #266 Anymouse 🌹🏡😷

Reuters:

U.S. Supreme Court rejects case involving Trump-aligned lawyer Eastman

(more)

As well they should have: IANAL, but to me this case seems on thin grounds even for a RWNJ/Republican (they were claiming that because the private org that cancelled Eastman’s appearance was renting their space from the City of Pasadena, that this was somehow a “government” restriction of speech) - I’m surprised this even got as far as SCOTUS in the first place.

ADD: never mind: I see the SC didn’t “hear” the appeal, just (rightly, IMO) bounced it.