re: #2 Lumberhead

The sad thing is that she will be forced to address it. There is no evidence of her holding radical left wing views so I don’t get why something she wrote 40 years ago. A week ago she was being called a neocon. There’s probably more evidence of that than her being some kind of Alinskyite. No matter, Chuck Todd, George Stephanopolous, etc. will be sure to confront her with some wild imaginings from the fevered right wing.

You’re absolutely right.

They go with 40 year old associations and smears because that’s pretty much all they have. I expect to see a lot of 90’s style Clinton-hatin’ going on if she runs— we’ll see retreads of every smear they trotted out about her then for sure.