Overstatement after overstatement. This poster may do well to switch to decaf or at the least less time spend with the punditry.

If it were determined that he was involved in a “deal”, he should be brought up on charges of conspiracy of defrauding the taxpayers.

If there were more than mere circumstantial evidence as interpreted by a severe critic the point could be take more seriously.

The most rational and logical answer is that there never was any intention to allow those “tax errors” to expire.

That is not the most rational interpretation.