re: #299 stabby

Am I the first person to tell you that you have trouble with context?

Yeah, pretty much.

re: #300 stabby

If you’re actually incapable of seeing how my response answers your argument then you’re not a bright person at all.

On the other hand pretending to be too stupid to understand an argument is not a winning tactic.

No, what I see is that your reponse is a dodging away from the topic. I’ve made it very clear: You have two unrelated arguments; one is that the text and the character of Mohammed shows that Islam is evil, another is that the way that Muslims act in the world show that Islam is evil. I’ve addressed both of them, and you’re unable to actually reply to them. You just keep restating them as though I hadn’t said what I did.

If you want to try to actually argue, then defend the contention that the text and the character of Mohammed really matter, given the Tanakh and personages such as David in it, and defend the contention that the way that Muslims act in this world show the evil of Islam given, you know, the history of Christians in this world.

Rambling about how Muslims support genocide doesn’t serve to defend your position or explain those contradictions.