re: #301 subsailor68

It does. Good catch. Wonder if there are any teeth in the “enforcement” sections. It’s fine to say someone must be a (fill in the blank), but won’t mean much if there’s no requirement to do any checks. Guess I should keep reading too.

Well, if you read on through that section, there is a whole bunch of stuff about coordination with States and Homeland Security. For a matter of fact, you might say that this bill may actually give more teeth to Homeland Security.

This might actually get some push back from ACLU types and privacy issue concerns.

Interesting.