re: #307 Obdicut

Take some personal responsibility, dude. In your urge to smear me as as crazy as a 9/11 truther, you wrote some incoherent and stupid stuff.

I said your arguments were like truthers and bithers.

I still believe that.

It was you who tried to paint me as a truther.

I accept you didn’t mean it.

Oh thank you…. Again twisted beyond belief.

But you still did say that loose change showed that it was possible.

What I really said was:

“It (referring to loose change) is all about… hey this is possible..”

That was the first time.

The second time I said:

“if we watch “loose change” that it is shown to be possible (extremely remote) but possible. That is how they argue it. If you ever discussed it with one of them, they keep presenting the argument that it is possible… And to me they sound just like you do on this topic.”

extremely remote is how loose change shows it.

If you leave out the extremely remote, or that I was referring to loose change, then yes you could think that I thought it was possible. But leaving that stuff out would be…. well leaving the important stuff out.

So when YOU SAID “I don’t think the 9/11 conspiracies are at all possible, and it’s disappointing that you do.” You were being a asshole of the extreme kind.

Especially since you continue even after I make clear that:
“I am comparing the twisted logic that YOU seem to be fine with with the twisted logic that they seem fine with.”

Basically, don’t bring up 9/11 when you don’t have to. It’s wildly tasteless.

I brought up wild conspiracy theories. Nothing to with frat boys. Rather that I would have to allow for the possibility that there is a crotch shot of me on the net somewhere, only because I have changed in a locker room.

Yes, that is as crazy as any idiotic conspiracy theory.