Comment

Michael Steele Gets on Pro-Life's Bad Side

315
Taqiyyotomist3/12/2009 2:53:35 pm PDT

re: #211 loppyd

I don’t want nice. I want someone who will kick ass and take names and make no apologies for it.

Agreed. It would also be nice if some of our leading lights knew even half the history that the average Lizard knows. To not respond to Hughley’s insanity with facts regarding, say, the Klan’s founding, or the CRA of 1964, shows that Steele probably is not aware of these facts, and is probably as historically illiterate as 90% of the nation. We need leaders who know history - real, un-revised history - and can use this knowledge off the cuff, impromptu, with no teleprompter. Our elected leaders are supposed to know more than us, yet, nobody - not Palin, not Steele, not Jindal, not Gingrich, not ANYONE, knows how to debate and use relevant information to actually provide an answer to a question. It seems that if they don’t have it written for them, then it doesn’t get said. If it’s not in the Talking Points for the week, then it’s not usable as material. It almost enrages me when I see these limo-riding elected douchebags unable to answer questions that even I, an un-college-educated 38-y.o. videogame player and reader of blogs, can just about answer in my sleep…and I’m in the bottom percentile here at LGF when it comes to knowledge. The BOTTOM! Why do we elect leaders who are more ignorant that the likes of ME?!