re: #330 Salamantis

And indeed, co2 levels were not a leading indicator of Ice Ages, but a lagging one, as vegetation froze that would otherwise have consumed co2.

I wanted to make this more explicit; it means that co2 levels were not the cause of Ice Ages so much as they were caused by them.

Sal, that is because there was less vegetation eating the carbon, and then if you had an eruption, the carbon lingered and things heated up.

Don’t you see we are killing more of our flora than an ice age, while we are pumping vastly more carbon than volcanos?

Don’t you see that your own argument supports AGW?