re: #339 Obdicut

You weren’t paying attention. I never said a type 0 system cannot be perturbed. Obviously CO2 introduction perturbs the environment somewhat. Ignoring the correction of negative feedback is the major flaw of AGW alarmism. It leads to the non-correlation between satellite data and the IPCC predictions, which by the way, non-correlation which has yet to be refuted in this thread.

And think about what you write: CO2 introduced into atmosphere would affect water vapor in a fashion to create a feedback loop

Sounds like the feedback loop gets “created” in real time? Man, those creative powers are just so —- I mean really CREATIVE

Do you honestly think that throwing around scientific jargon at random is going to convince anyone? It’s a rather odd tactic.

Yes yes yes. Oh that wretched scientific jargon. Gets thrown around by Al Gore, and some of you guys. Its all so odd isn’t it? Heaven forbid anyone introduce a simpified scientific process description here especially after being lambasted by the host as a scientific fraud.