re: #346 kirkspencer

Okay, but I’m letting you know right now it seems useful as the thought experiment— as in, explaining why the concepts of ‘simple’, ‘fair’, etc. can be satisfied by a system of high tax as well as low tax— but not as a real system. You seem to be prizing the velocity of money above absolutely everything, and that’s not good. Velocity of money is good, but it’s more about removing barriers to it rather than encouraging it by insisting on expenditure— any expenditure.