For all those who would like to claim the post is ‘kook fodder’, here is what Charles said:

Horton’s piece contains some very disturbing details that strongly suggest the full story has yet to come out

For purposes of discussion, rather than baiting or attempting to pick fights with individuals here such as myself who happen to agree with that statement, I suggest the following:

1. Explain where and why and how you disagree with that statement, which will require you to actually read the Horton piece.
2. Try to justify your claim that that statement is ‘kook fodder’.

Or better still, leave aside random insults like “kook fodder” entirely, and try to make substantive and cogent arguments and/or objections, preferably with links. Such as I have done in this thread.