I’ve thought about this for a couple of days.

I remember a long time ago, here on this blog, the New York Times (among others) was not considered a credible source. Any article, regardless of topic, author or content, was dismissed out of hand by posters.

Charles, to his credit, did post at least one article from the Times, stating “giving credit where credit is due.”

I do not want to return to that time. I’m not prepared to censor my reading or what I share based on the venue alone.

I found something worth sharing in the Reason.com article.

I won’t go back.

YMMV