re: #338 Obdicut

I don’t think you’re getting it.

What “it”? I have said I understand he has tried (and failed) to play his taxes to his advantage. I have said I think there is damaging data in there. And that fact can and should be used against him. We agree about Harry to a at least to a point. And I know you to be a guy that gets the accusation/evidence thing.

What did I miss?