re: #36 Fairly Sure I’m Still Obdicut

we really should be done with the back and forth about the strength of citing the law of the land to support a point. I can’t imagine any reader is left with any doubt about our differing views there.

They have exactly the same civil protection as an average person under what I’m proposing. Exactly the same. Not in the least bit different, in any way, at all.

So again, can you come up with a harm that is done?

Saying so does not make it so.

How is a greater exposure to stops without cause harmless? And say the cop asks about that bulge and is told “it’s a cell phone under my jacket. May I leave now? “

Really we are wasting time on a small point or procedure, procedures that should have the same checks and balances as any. I’m not keen on making a subclass with lesser protections out of CCW hiolders, and that is what you want amounts to. Either they get to walk away right then or it’s a search to verify.

As much as you may disagree is there anything I have said you don’t comprehend?