re: #364 Buck

And we don’t yet know who the target might have been. Everyone is assuming Gifford, and that the Judge was collateral. I have not heard that it could not be the other way around.

The shooter has views form both sides of the crazy. This means the Left will only see see the views that might identify him as right. And the Right will do the opposite, only consider his leftist views as relevant.

Your MBF argument is false.

We’re seeing a pretty clear picture that this guy was a liberterian.

This gave him some views that were technically socially liberal but really had more to do with cutting the governments power than believing that people should be allowed to smoke pot or gays should be treated just like everyone else as a matter of principle.

What proof do you have that he was crazy on the left?