re: #369 Dr. Matt
Except for the the simple fact that your quoted statement doesn’t exist. True story.
While the statement in and of itself does not in fact exist, her insinuation that SP should have aborted her child was blatantly clear. Hence the dog pile.
I understood at first why the Republican party would choose someone as “pure et dure” (pure and hard) as this woman, who thought it wise to bring a fifth child into the world who has Down’s Syndrome. There are four other children already born who need the time, attention and resources of their two parents, and you are not going to tell me they will not suffer with the arrival of a fifth sibling who is going to take away considerable attention and time from them, considering that DS is a condition that afflicts much more than just the intellect.