re: #11 Gus

And they know they’re lying. At least a good half know they’re lying. No one was even thinking about Chris Loesch since CPAC. Heck, I never even saw his name mentioned in my timeline.

For serious. If Charles — or any other of “the progressive lynch mob” — could just snap his fingers and get someone blocked, why would they use it on Chris Loesch of all people?

It’s pretty clear that what happened was that CLoesch went kind of nuts on twitter and they shut him down for that automatically, not that he was targeted by anyone.

Hell, if it was true that he was being targeted, wouldn’t there be some proof of that? The Internet is a pretty open place and you’d think there would be a smoking gun somewhere if that were the case.