re: #399 prononymous

I deny it. How does showing that businesses are using loopholes and/or outright fraud to deceive the government and public for the sake of extra profits indicate in any way that the science is flawed?

Sounds more like a case of business corruption and fraud as well as a lack of proper oversight and regulation of them by the government.

Think of it like Pamela Geller giving Charles Johnson a bad reputation, and maybe you’ll understand my point.