re: #390 dmjboose

My apologies Charles. My snark is clearly backfiring. I agree with everything you said, except the part about me citing the DI. I was using the DI as an example of people who constantly spout pseudo-scientific garbage as if it’s really science. I’m proposing discussing this garbage for the purpose of explaining that it isn’t science so that kids who are likely to hear more garbage in their lifetime will be able to tell the difference.

Than you’d have another issue. If you talked about the weakness of the literal Bible in science class, then you are messing with private faith.