re: #378 No Dhummi
I didn’t ignore it. That’s what I was referring to when I mentioned what you guys had called “circumstantial evidence”, and you guys are right: that’s all it is.
Advertising is not endorsed. And possibly someone could have played off that ad and made the facebook group to defame him (as many have trying to do for a long time.) In any case, even in a court of law where the defendant is actually given the chance to present his side, circumstantial evidence isn’t taken as all you need to know in order to convict.
It’s on Jihad Watch in a Spencer Post.
re: #86 jcm
The Nakba, May 29, 1453
Posted by Robert at May 29, 2008 11:05 AM