…and the latest claim of the AGW deniers is that the data is not only wrong, but fraudulent.

Charles’ statement here implies that AGW is established scientific fact and demonizes those that refute it as being such. Just by using the word denier Charles sets the table with the very same language that we use to characterize the nasty people that deny the Holocaust. Similarly the harsh language Charles employs here tends to give free pass to political groups that use propagandistic and non-empirical science to promote their political agenda to destroy the financial system of Western liberalism.

I don’t very often disagree with Charles, but on this particular use of language I definitely do.

.