Meanwhile, read through Steve Silberman’s responses to getting in the middle of it. He thinks both should walk away (despite finding that what Chuck did was creepy).

No, what Chuck did was criminal - vandalism is but one part. He engaged in stalking behavior, and he has no substantiation of any of the other claims against Charles.

What we do have is a mountain of evidence showing that Charles keeps pointing out all the BS Chuck tweets and posts - lies, smears, and bogus claims about pretty much every hot button topic (all while injecting himself into issues on which he has zero knowledge). And for doing so, Chuck calls him a stalker.

Chuck keeps using that word. It doesn’t mean what he thinks it means.

However, there’s another word that should be used in describing Chuck.

Sociopath. If the definition fits, you must use it. And it does. He doesn’t see what he’s doing is wrong. He’s amoral. He’s ahistorical. And he clearly doesn’t seem to have any problems engaging in criminal activities.