re: #427 cliffster

a constitutional amendment, eh? do you have any idea what it takes to get a constitutional amendment done?

either way, if there was such an amendment, it would render roe/wade irrelevant.

Actually, no. A constitutional amendment would directly contradict Roe V Wade is it currently stands, and thus it would be struck down immediately. Thus, Roe V Wade would have to be overturned first, then an amendment could be passed.