re: #438 stabby

Yeah well I said that the implied “all” was just flourish. Got anything else?

Yeah, that that’s not in any way an adequate defense.

My actual contention, that the belief in a harsh intolerant God, can, through obvious mechanisms, restrict the mind and create harsh conservatism isn’t even contentious among normal people.

And it’s not contentious, except for the babble of ‘restrict the mind’. That it ‘can’ do it isn’t. If you’d actually make that argument in the beginning, i wouldn’t have taken issue with it.

But you didn’t. You made a shitty, stupid argument even you admit was flawed. So why whine when I call you out on it?