re: #463 LudwigVanQuixote

That is actually the main problem with Dawkins’ anti-religious arguments. He really does believe that religion is immoral.

If you were to ask him the basis of his morality, he would argue that one does not need religion to be moral. This is true as far as it goes, but it quickly runs into the issue of OK he likes his construct of whatever morality is better than the one received from religion.

Since you can not write an equation for morality, once again, he is only projecting his personal constructs as universal truths.

Not so. People need to read or reread Plato— the Euthyphro. the gods are not the source of morality.