re: #44 Buck

OK this is something you need to work out.

What is something I need to work out, Buck?

However in my opinion and in the opinion of the law, even if you think you otherwise, the act of forced intercourse on a child is both violent and non-consensual.

No, it’s not. There is nothing in the law saying that it’s violent. And the law says that a child cannot lawfully consent. It doesn’t mean children don’t consent. It means that in the eye of the law, just as consent granted by an impaired individual, it does not stand.

A child could consent to have sex with an adult out of pure love— as, sadly, is the case in many cases of incest, and it wouldn’t matter.

You have twisted your way through this entire argument solely to defend those on the GOP who wished to deny abortion access to a certain number of women who were raped. What makes it more baffling is that there are plenty of people in the GOP who want to deny all women who were raped access to abortion. There are others who have stated that they don’t believe a woman can conceive if it was during rape.

Think about what you’re doing to yourself by making these sorts of arguments. Why throw away your humanity for the sake of those bastards?