re: #459 Gus 802

Ah, so he does. Well, I happen to agree with him but it’s a list and he says regarding explaining scientific events to not rely on superstition, holy books, authority, or revelation.

Dawkins uses terminology insulting to people with religious beliefs all the time. I think he was rather constrained more than usual this time, especially in the face of the obnoxious stupidity and fascism ad hominem from O’Reilly. I just think it’s unfortunate that Dawkins is the face of atheism. It’s great to have him on the side of defending evolution, but he shouldn’t put himself up as a spokesperson. He’s just not good at PR for his cause.