Maybe I am just not following this correctly but I understood this to be a debate about allegedly selling fetal tissue /body parts, not whether there should be abortions at all. The fact that women can abort a baby is just that, a fact, and it isn’t debatable, so when watching her speech I don’t really follow. What I understood the vote in congress was about, was de-funding that specific organization for allegedly selling the tissue. I believe some states have started investigations into their local branches. If indeed they are illegally selling the tissue, which as of right now there is no evidence of, then they should be de-funded and brought up on charges. If they are not then I am sure we will see civil suits and they will end up getting a large chunk of change for their trouble.

They way her speech played out it really appeared as if she was the one playing the political game. Just IMO.