Trumpâs continued attacks on Curizel could wind up getting his attroneys Klaymanâed
Eventually, Chin dismissed Klaymanâs clientâs case with a few choice words for the way counsel had conducted it. Not long after, the judge got a letter from Klayman and his co-counsel, Paul Orfanedes, asking a few âquestionsâ about the judgeâs Asian American background and mentioning another case they had brought against the Clinton administration. They then filed a brief questioning the judgeâs impartiality:
Mr. Klayman and Mr. Orfanedes became concerned that because the Court was a recent appointee of President Clinton ⌠and Mr. Klayman had been prominently mentioned in the media for his role in the Commerce Department case, which focused in part on the White House, the Democratic National Committee, John Huang, Melinda Yee, and other persons in the Asian and Asian-American communities, and because the lawsuit had elicited such angry responses from the White House, Democrats and the Asian-American community, that the Court might be angry at them and unable to be fair and impartial âŚ
In a written response, Chin noted that he hadnât been aware of Klaymanâs other lawsuit. As for the questions about his race, he said, âThis sentiment is absurd and demeans me individually and the Court as a whole.â
He then lowered the boom. Klayman and Orfanedes were required to withdraw as counsel from the case and would not be permitted to appear in Chinâs court on any matter ever again. They would be required to show his opinion to any other judge in the district in any future case. The court clerk would also report the sanctions to every court where they held bar membership.