re: #488 sattv4u2

Here’s what I know: a) there is no relation between that terrorist’s school friends and drone strikes;
b) KT is obsessed with drones; c) KT called the guys who’ve been let off in court right now and who may be innocent (or some of them may be), “terrorists” (apparently he would approve of droning them). So why would I assume that what he wrote is a joke, esp. if there is no apparent meaning to the alleged joke?

If it was a joke, it was a pretty stupid and meaningless one, and moreover, it would be sufficient to write in response to my question, “it’s a joke, dummy”, instead of engaging in drama about “creepy stalker files” and whatever.