re: #4 Daniel Ballard

It’s kinda frustrating trying to see who has the truth on their side on this. The CIA, terrorists, and a jealous mistress. A triumverate of motives, possible lies and unexpected motivations.

I’m waiting for a WH report on up the road. Until then I am unlikely to be surprised at confirmation of almost any of the scenarios.

Well I just dont understand why she would say what she did. Nobody else said anything of the sort. And if she had some inside info, wouldn’t it be stupid to blurt it out like that?
She acts like a woman scorned, or at least one who believes she was. At this point, she holds no credibility for me.