re: #502 Obdicut

Reading quite a bit into that, aren’t you?

Are there reasons to disagree with the science of AGW other than what he wrote?

He never gave any reasons for disagreeing with it. He simply dismissed any and all criticism of it as something only a troglodyte would engage in.

Which runs counter to how science is conducted.

Please don’t waste my time arguing that those on the opposite side are unscientific. That’s not the topic I’m discussing, which is Ludwig’s hypocrisy and irrationality.

The kitten awaits. Later.