re: #521 LudwigVanQuixote

Actually it goes hand and hand with what I am talking about. Good show.

Nice. re: #520 hopperandadropper

There is actually a fairly simple test which can be applied to the global warming debate. Which side of the argument is supporting (a) higher taxes, (b) more government control over your life, (c) more government control over businesses, (d) loss of national sovereignty, (e) creating a new bureaucracy to run it all?

I’m voting with the other guys, thanks.

Increases in taxes and regulations go hand and hand with population growth. After all, fitting a few million people into a small space is a recipe for disaster without a lot of regulation to sort things out. And the more regulation the more taxation to keep the system running.

Maybe some of Paul Ehrlich’s ideas would be a nice fit for your political philosophy. I’m not being facetious, I agree with some of his ideas.